|
| |
|
Independent Designated Observer Pilot Program FINAL
REPORT October 2010
|
|
Overview One of
the American Horse Protection Association’s (“AHPA”)
missions is the protection and preservation of
America’s wild horses and burros on US public
rangelands.
The Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM”)
has the authority and responsibility to
ensure, to its best ability, the welfare of wild
horses and burros during the gather, holding, and
transporting process when horses are removed from
public rangeland.
|
|
In line
with BLM’s ongoing development of its animal welfare
program, in June 2010, AHPA offered to initiate a
Pilot Independent Designated Observer Program
(“Pilot Program”) that involved the observation and
reporting on the care and handling of wild horses
and burros during the gather process at three major
summer gathers: Owyhee HMA (NV); Stinking Waters HMA
(OR); and Twin Peaks HMA (CA). It is important
to note that the Pilot Program was not intended to
replace public observation days. Additionally, the
Pilot Program was specific to the care and handling
of the animals only. BLM policy regarding removals
was not within the scope of the Pilot Program.
|
|
AHPA
engaged four independent credentialed professionals
who are academia-based equine veterinarians or
equine specialists: Camie Heleski, Ph.D., from
Michigan University; Betsy Greene, Ph.D., from the
University of Vermont; Sarah Ralston, VMD, Ph.D.,
from Rutgers University, and Carolyn Stull, Ph.D.,
from University of California at Davis. Several of
the above individuals were instrumental in writing
the horse chapter of the Guide for the Care and
Use of Agricultural Animals in Teaching and Research,
published by the Federation of Animal Science
Societies.
|
|
Each
observer served on a team of two, and was tasked
specifically to observe the care and handling of the
animals for a 3-4 day period during the gather
process, and submit their findings to AHPA. An
Evaluation Checklist was provided to each of the
observers which included four sections: Gather
Activities; Horse Handling During Gather; Horse
Description; and Temporary Holding Facility.
|
|
Each team was
accompanied by a designated BLM employee to each
gather, and was introduced to BLM personnel, APHIS
veterinarians, and contractor employees present on
site as independent observers in attendance to
observe the care and handling of animals only. Team
members were given access to the trap site and
corrals, and observed in a quiet and unobtrusive
manner minimizing any interference or impact on the
process, interacting with BLM personnel, APHIS
veterinarians and employees of the Cattoor Livestock
Roundup, Inc. (the contractor for all three gathers)
as needed. Overall, team members were well received.
BLM, APHIS, and the contractor were open and
informative with information about the gather
process, procedures, veterinary treatment, and
answered any questions asked. The contractor and its
employees did
|
|
not restrict access
and discussed methods of care and handling of
animals and answered questions freely.
|
|
Observations
and Findings
|
|
General:
While the Pilot
Program included gathers in three different HMAs
with unique geographic considerations and employing
separate ground personnel, the following
observations were recurrent among the three gathers:
|
|
•
Although it was evident that there was a
variety of expertise among handlers, generally,
crews (contactor and BLM personnel) appeared to be
gentle and knowledgeable, used acceptable methods
for moving horses forward as endorsed by Temple
Grandin, and were skilled with the balance point and
flight zone of the animals.
|
|
•
Chutes and pens were set up in a manner that
reflected recommended handling practices for
reducing animal stress in trap facilities, with the
site located on a normal travel path of the animals
and the opening shaped in a “V” using jute to mask
the entry chute.
|
|
•
Horses were sorted appropriately: mature
stallions, juvenile stallions, dry mares, mares with
foals, plus pens for injured or sick animals and
orphan foals at the temporary holding facilities.
|
|
•
Generally, horses did not exhibit undue
stress or show signs of extreme sweating or duress
due to the helicopter portion of the gather,
maintaining a trot or canter gait only as they
entered the wings of the trap. Rather horses showed
more anxiety once they were closed in the pens in
close quarters; however, given time to settle, most
of the horses engaged in normal behavior with few
vocalizations, few agonistic encounters or
breeding-oriented behavior.
|
|
•
Excessive activity from public observers and
increased BLM personnel generating noise and
distraction near the proximity of the trap site and
along the pathway of movement resulted in repeated
attempts to move animals into the trap area, and
increased the distance travelled by horses.
Likewise, vehicles parked near the area surrounding
the trap site were visible to the horses and
hampered their willingness to approach the trap.
|
|
•
Overall, body condition score (BCS) based on
the Henneke Body Condition Scale, ranged from 4-7.
Lowest BCS was 3-1/2 for lactating mares.
|
|
•
Horses were assessed by APHIS veterinarians
to be capable of travel before transport to BLM
holding facility as well as to evaluate/treat all
injuries.
|
|
•
APHIS veterinarians were open and candid
regarding treatment protocol including the scenario
which occurred at the Owyhee gather involving water
toxemia and resulting in a number of deaths. In case
of euthanasia or injuries, there was no attempt to
minimize or hide any information or details related
to the injuries or euthanasia procedures.
|
|
•
When faced with unexpected and extraordinary
circumstances (e.g., water toxemia at the Owyhee
gather) BLM, APHIS, and the contractor demonstrated
the ability to review, assess and adapt procedures
to ensure the care and well being of the animals to
the best of their ability.
|
|
Gather Activities:
Team
members were asked to briefly describe activities at
the gather site and temporary holding facilities,
including the role of authorized personnel present,
description of the facilities, equipment and
vehicles utilized in the gather.
|
|
The following are
observations relating to gather activities:
|
|
•
The
helicopter’s precision was favorably noted, and
compared to a dog working sheep. It was reasonably
quiet – no louder than riding lawn mower, and stayed
quite distance from herd driving them down to the
trap sites and utilized space well. The only time
the helicopter got close was when it was pushing the
animals toward the final section of the trap.
•
Chutes and pens set up in a manner that resembled
Temple Grandin’s recommendation for reducing animal
stress in holding facilities, with the site located
on a normal travel path of the animals and the
opening shaped in a “V” using jute to mask the entry
chute.
•
Horses travelled an average of 5-7 miles to trap
site, and a Judas (or Prada) horse was utilized.
Most horses entered the trap at a trot, some at a
canter.
•
APHIS veterinarians were on site to attend to any
injuries and to monitor condition of horses. The
team members arrived after the Tuscarora portion of
Owyhee HMA but were briefed by APHIS veterinarians.
•
Contractors and BLM personnel separately kept lists
on horses moving through chute, noting sex, color,
injuries, and whether a mare was lactating or with a
foal, etc.
•
At
the Owyhee gather, the contractor set up a
temporary, smaller scale trap about an hour’s drive
from primary gather site to adapt to group of horses
likely in serious water deprivation.
•
The
50-56 foot straight-deck trailers and stock trailers
used to transport horses appeared to be well
maintained and appropriate for task. Solid-sided
roughed surface step ramp used for loading onto the
straight-deck trailers.
•
At
the Twin Peaks gather, the presence of a large
number of the public generated excess activity and
noise. Combined with an increased number of vehicles
parked near the trap site, this impacted the
contractor’s ability to successfully move animals to
the corrals and increased the amount of distance the
horses travelled.
|
|
•
At the Owyhee gather, several changes in
procedure were incorporated to decrease the
potential for future water toxemia issues, such as
allowing horses access to smaller
|
|
amount of water prior
to access to water tanks. It was observed to be an
effective way to take edge off their thirst and to
prevent horses from diving into water troughs. Such
changes had a direct impact on the health of the
horses and once implemented resulted in a decrease
in mortality and body condition. After a portion of
the Owyhee gather was completed, team members flew
over segments of the Owhyee HMA, the Little Humboldt
HMA, and the Rock Creek HMA to survey conditions
from the air and saw only a few horses in the Owyhee
HMA but did see dried up reservoirs. Observed
several dozen wild horses in the other two HMAs in
small bands, and flew over the site where several
horses had been found dead due to dehydration near
multiple openings in the fenced areas.
|
|
Horse Handling
During Gather:
Team members were
asked to describe and evaluate the helicopters used
in the gathers; the use of handling aids; abusive or
inappropriate handling of horses; injury to horses;
and the sorting and loading procedures.
|
|
The following are
observations relating to horse handling during the
gathers:
|
|
•
In general, the overall handling of the
horses followed acceptable equine husbandry
practices, and personnel demonstrated knowledge in
moving horses in a quiet and effective manner.
|
|
•
The few times the crew used their hands or
handling aids (e.g., plastic bag on end of whip)
directly on a horse was when the horse braced up
against the back gate, refusing to move, and this
handling was not deemed to be excessive.
|
|
•
Horses being loaded into trailers were
handled fairly quietly and reasonably, utilizing
visual and noise stimulations from waving flags or
whips w/plastic bags and the occasional use of noise
paddles to move horses forward. Stallions were
loaded first, dry mares second, wet mares third, and
foals were separated in the rear of the trailers. No
handling aids were used to load horses in to stock
trailer – horses were loaded willingly.
|
|
•
For purposes of loading and shipping, wet
(lactating) mares were temporarily separated from
foals to prevent injuries, and were reunited upon
arrival at temporary holding facilities Although
there was mare and foal vocalization during this
process, no extreme displays of behavior (e.g., gate
crashing) were witnessed. Temporary separation of
mare and foal in this situation is a preventative to
limit injury of the animals.
|
|
•
Wet mares and foals were transported to BLM
holding facilities as early in the day as possible
to minimize the time they are apart and also to
minimize heat stress to more vulnerable groups.
|
|
•
At the Stinking Water gather, a 23 year old
stallion jumped out of the pen and escaped the trap
site. About ½ mile from trap, he was subsequently
roped and his legs were tied while in a recumbent
position, and eventually was transported in a two
compartment stock horse trailer back to the Burns
Corrals.
|
|
•
There were a number of additional horses that
were roped and hogtied at the Stinking Water gather
without injury, and one small young foal was ground
roped from a pen to quickly remove if from mature
horses without incidence.
|
|
Horse Description:
Team
members were asked to describe the general condition
of the horses. The following are observations
relating to horse description:
|
|
•
Overall, body condition score (BCS) based on
the Henneke Body Condition Scale, ranged from 4-7.
A few lactating mares at the Owyhee gather
scored a 3.5, and one horse at the Stinking Water
gather scored an 8.
|
|
•
At the Owyhee gather, horses were observed to
be tucked up suggesting decreased water intake. Some
foals had mud on their faces, suggesting they had
been trying to suck water because their dams were
not producing sufficient milk, and willingly drank
water from a bucket which is uncommon and implies
tremendous thirst.
|
|
•
Hoof condition was generally good with no
significant defects. One foal at the Stinking Water
gather had noticeable chipping in one hoof but was
not lame.
|
|
•
Coat/hide condition was generally good and
clean, and indicative of the summer season.
|
|
•
Lameness: One mare at the Bull Flats
temporary holding facility (Twin Peaks gather) was
grade 3 lame at the trot, with no visible lesions.
At the Litchfield short term holding facility two
foals were observed to be stiff and foot sore but
mobile. One stallion at the Owyhee gather came in
lame with an old knee injury.
|
|
•
Injuries: One mare with pre-existing injury
to hind leg at the Twin Peaks gather; superficial
scrapes/kick wounds and one ~4 inch laceration which
was sutured by the APHIS veterinarian in the squeeze
chute at the Stinking Water gather; cuts and scrapes
were noted at the Owyhee gather and were most often
treated with a furazone type product.
|
|
•
Illness: A few horses exhibited colicky signs
at the Owyhee gather; one mare was observed to have
symptoms of rhabdomyolysis at the Stinking Water
gather.
|
|
•
Generally, horses did not exhibit undue
stress or show signs of extreme sweating or duress
due to the helicopter portion of the gather,
maintaining a trot or canter gait. At the Stinking
Water gather, two horses (a stallion and mare) that
had eluded initial capture were sweaty and breathing
rapidly but both recovered within 30 minutes. Rather
horses showed more anxiety once they were closed in
the pens in close quarters; however, given time to
settle, most of the horses engaged in normal
behavior with few vocalizations, few agonistic
encounters or breeding-oriented behavior.
|
|
•
There was minimal fighting among stallions
(when mares were not present) especially when there
were 4 or more stallions in a pen, except for “meet
and greet” sessions with some normal posturing
behavior. There was occasional kicking among the mares.
|
|
•
Mortalities: At the Owyhee gather, there were
two accidental injuries resulting in death: 1) A 6
yr old black stud had hit his head the previous day
dislocating a cervical vertebrae (subsequent
necropsy also showed heavy infestation of bots and
strongyles); and 2) a grey mare ran into panel and
was treated with banamine and IV dexamethasone to
give her a chance to recover, however, she showed no
response or improvement and was subsequently
euthanatized by gunshot. At the Stinking Water
gather, a 14 year old stallion with numerous
pre-existing injuries and blind in one eye was
deemed to be dangerous and unadoptable and was
euthanatized by gunshot.
|
|
•
APHIS veterinarian was forthcoming in
apprising team members of treatment protocol and
decision to euthanize. Team members moved away for
safety reasons and respect for what the veterinarian
needed to do.
|
|
Temporary Holding
Facility:
Team members were asked to describe the design and
function of the holding facilities; the sorting of
the animals in the pens; horse behavior in the
enclosures; availability of water and forage;
transport vehicles and the loading and unloading
procedures.
|
|
The following are
observations relating to the temporary holding
facilities:
|
|
•
Although there was a variety of expertise
among handlers, generally, crews (contactor and BLM
personnel) appeared to be gentle and knowledgeable,
skilled with the balance point and flight zone of
the animals, and used acceptable methods for moving
horses forward as endorsed by Temple Grandin.
|
|
•
Holding pens are set up with as few corners
as possible and are composed of sturdy gates, and
the vast majority of panels have snow fence (both
orange and black, the color of which did not seem to
matter) or jute mesh covering them.
|
|
•
Pens and chutes were watered down to reduce
the amount of dust and footing was good.
|
|
•
Water was provided in multiple troughs and
electrolytes provided as needed. At the Owyhee
gather, it was observed that few horses appeared to
drink from the tanks, although foals were active
drinkers implying thirst. They were limited to ½
bucket to avoid colic/water toxicity.
|
|
•
Hay appeared to be a good quality
grass/legume and is distributed around the outer
edges of the round pens to facilitate access to all
of the horses in the pen.
|
|
•
Upon arrival at the temporary holding site,
horses were sorted by running them individually
through a squeeze chute where they were aged by
looking at their teeth using two sticks to pry open
their lips, and their gender was also documented. At
the Stinking Water gather, lactating mares were
identified with spray paint on their hip or torso.
|
|
•
Horses were placed in pens according to their
gender and appeared to have enough space to move
about in. Separate pens were provided for horses
needed to be watched (young or orphaned foals,
horses acting colicky, old or weak horses).
|
|
•
Some groups of horses were agitated when
approached for behavioral observations; however,
others remained calm and unfettered.
|
|
•
Foals observed nursing; reasonably content
but some mares appeared somewhat agitated with kick
threats. Many had battle scars but arrived with
them.
|
|
•
Mares and newly separated foals showed some
distress (increased vocalization and locomotion);
however, once mares were separated out the foals
were observed drinking from water troughs.
|
|
•
Some vocalizations among mares and foals upon
pairing up again, and senior stallions calling to
mares and vice versa. Once foals were reunited with
their dams they resumed nursing.
|
|
•
When in groups, horses seemed to be less
anxious. Horses moving through the chutes one at a
time exhibited more anxiety as they experienced a
change in the footing and sounds and lost the
comfort level of moving as a group.
|
|
•
It appeared to be difficult to get the first
horse though the narrow gates, and as horses moved
through the chutes in single file, there was
increased agitation with horses kicking at gates or
other horses with both hind feet and with vigor.
Other horses tried to climb out of the chute
resulting in a few injuries, mostly cuts and
scrapes.
|
|
•
At the Twin Peaks gather, horses were
transported from the Rodeo Flats trap site to the
Bull Flats temporary holding facility, and then
again to the Litchfield Corrals resulting in the
potential of increased stress associated with
repeated loading and unloading.
|
|
Based on the observations
of the independent designated observers, the following
recommendations are offered for consideration:
|
|
Ø
If at all
possible, horses should not be roped or tied down in a
recumbent position for prolonged periods of time,
especially coinciding with exhaustive or over-heated
conditions. Strict criteria should be established to
determine the initiation and purpose of this practice.
If necessary to implement these procedures, these horses
should be identified, marked, and/or confined separately
from the others in the gather and observed for any
injuries or metabolic conditions for the next 48 hours.
This could be achieved by moving these animals to
designated, smaller holding corrals.
|
|
Ø
Excessively
aggressive horses (studs or mares) should be isolated as
soon as possible or grouped with horses they were with
before capture (i.e., a harem stallion with his foals or
dry mares) rather than stand waiting in the chutes or
alleyways.
|
|
Ø More of an effort should be
made to ensure that horses enter the sorting chute face
forward and that if a ‘lead’ horse gets stuck the
primary effort should be made to get it to move forward
rather than encouraging the horses behind it to move on
top of the first horse. As an alternative, the back gate
of the single file alley should be opened, allowing the
horse(s) to exit the alley, and re-orient the horse
forwards to the chute rather than aggressively try to
back it in the chute or make it turn around.
|
|
Ø Another suggestion is to
make the chute progressively darker (tighter woven snow
fence over the course of several dozen feet) which would
still allow an advance chance to determine gender of the
animals.
|
|
Ø Consider widening gate
areas leading to chutes/alley to afford more than one
horse to move on. Work more slowly even in ‘rescue’
scenarios.
|
|
Ø Thick padding should be
placed on the rails above the gates (overhead).
|
|
Ø The height of the outside
fence panels of the temporary holding facility for the
stud pens should be raised from 6 feet to 7 feet to
discourage rearing or jumping over and sustaining
possible injuries.
|
|
Ø Railings where horses will
be herded past should be kept free of all hanging items
such as jackets or other apparel to avoid spooking the
animals.
|
|
Ø Short term holding
facilities with wire fencing (e.g., Litchfield) should
be transitioned to steel rail livestock panels to
improve safety and security factors for fencing.
|
|
Ø All corrals should remain
free from trash and baling twine to prevent digestive
tract problems as well as injury resulting in entangling
twine.
|
|
Ø Horses held in any
enclosure over 4 hours after the gather at the trap site
should be provided with access to hay and water in at
least 100 gallon containers unless the horses are
seriously dehydrated or compromised and, in the opinion
of a veterinarian, should have restricted access to
reduce the risk of water intoxication.
|
|
Ø Lidocaine spray (or other
topical anesthetic) should be utilized by attending
veterinarians in order to facilitate suturing of wounds
in horses in the squeeze chute.
|
|
Ø
Transport
(unloading and loading) of animals should be kept to a
minimum. For example, when distance is similar and road
conditions provide for better transport horses should be
transported from the trap site directly to short term
holding rather than temporary.
|
|
Ø
Public observers
and increased BLM personnel should be limited in the
number, activity and proximity to the trap site in order
not to hinder the least resistant pathway of movement
and minimize the distance travelled of the horses into
the trap area necessary for a successful gather.
|
|
Ø Prohibit parked vehicles in
direct sight of horses moving toward the trap site and
corrals.
|
|
Ø Consider instituting a
lottery system to limit the number of public observers
in order to ensure that distractions to horses being
gathered to allow for the safe handling of the animals
as they move toward the trap site and corrals.
|
|
Ø Consider installing camera
monitors in the chutes/corrals at short term holding
facilities or trap sites for the public to observe
gathering, loading, unloading and preparation of
animals. The public could watch at the short term
holding facilities and not be additionally stressful to
the animals.
|
|
Ø Consider mounting a
wide-angle lens camera on the helicopter during gather
to record movement and behavior of the horses to study
the effects of the helicopter on the horses.
|
|
The observations and
recommendations contained in this report are offered in
good faith and as part of AHPA’s ongoing dialogue with
BLM to ensure that the care and well being of the
animals in the wild horse and burro program is a top
priority. While not all recommendations may be
practicable to the operation, AHPA respectfully requests
that BLM review each recommendation and if deemed to be
not feasible, to address the reasons why.
|
|
Utilizing academia-based
equine veterinarians and equine specialists as
independent designated observers provides science based,
hands-on documentation concerning the care and handling
of horses during the gather process, and can be used to
both validate existing practices and identify areas in
need of improvement. By engaging accredited
professionals within the horse industry, BLM is able to
tap the knowledge of those specifically trained in horse
behavior and equine veterinary medicine and incorporate
industry practices into its policies and procedures. As
stated at the onset, while the Pilot Program in no way
takes the place of public observation, it serves as an
assessment tool for the care and handling practices used
in the wild horse and burro program, and opens the door
to further science-based evaluation of the program.
|
|
Team members are
considering submitting an abstract for subsequent
publication to the Equine Science Society on their
observations at the three gathers. Publication would be
advantageous to BLM in that it authenticates the
findings of the independent designated observer pilot
program and would be helpful in the ongoing development
of its animal welfare program.
|
|
Click here for a printable PDF of this report:
AHPAFinalReport[1].pdf |
|
|
|